EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-664/21, Nec Plus Ultra Cosmetics AG: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije — Slovenia) — Nec Plus Ultra Cosmetics AG v Republika Slovenija (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 138(1) — Exemptions for intra-community transactions — Supply of goods — Principles of tax neutrality, effectiveness and proportionality — Compliance with substantive requirements — Time limit for the submission of evidence)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CA0664

62021CA0664

March 2, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/18

(Case C-664/21, (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>) Nec Plus Ultra Cosmetics AG)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common system of value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 138(1) - Exemptions for intra-community transactions - Supply of goods - Principles of tax neutrality, effectiveness and proportionality - Compliance with substantive requirements - Time limit for the submission of evidence)

(2023/C 155/20)

Language of the case: Slovenian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Nec Plus Ultra Cosmetics AG

Defendant: Republika Slovenija

Operative part of the judgment

Article 131 and Article 138(1) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, read in conjunction with the principles of tax neutrality, effectiveness and proportionality,

must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which prohibits the production and gathering of new evidence which establishes that the substantive conditions laid down in Article 138(1) of that directive are satisfied, during the administrative procedure which resulted in the adoption of the tax assessment notice, in particular after the tax inspection stage but before the adoption of that decision, provided that the principles of equivalence and effectiveness have been complied with.

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 64, 7.2.2022.

Language of the case: Slovenian

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia