- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-495/22: Judgment of the General Court of 28 June 2023 — UGA Nutraceuticals v EUIPO — BASF (OMEGOR) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark OMEGOR — Earlier EU figurative mark OMACOR — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TA0495
62022TA0495
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
14.8.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 286/26
(Case T-495/22) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Word mark OMEGOR - Earlier EU figurative mark OMACOR - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(2023/C 286/35)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: UGA Nutraceuticals Srl (Gubbio, Italy) (represented by: M. Riva, J. Graffer and A. Ottolini, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Chylińska and T. Frydendahl, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: BASF AS (Oslo, Norway)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 10 June 2022 (Case R 1168/2021-4).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders UGA Nutraceuticals Srl and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear their own costs.
(*)
Language of the case: English.
OJ C 380, 3.10.2022.