- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-182/13: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Industrial Tribunals (Northern Ireland) (United Kingdom) made on 12 April 2013 — Valerie Lyttle, Sarah Louise Halliday, Clara Lyttle, Tanya McGerty v Bluebird UK Bidco 2 Limited
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013CN0182
62013CN0182
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
29.6.2013
Official Journal of the European Union
C 189/4
(Case C-182/13)
2013/C 189/06
Language of the case: English
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: Valerie Lyttle, Sarah Louise Halliday, Clara Lyttle, Tanya McGerty
Defendant: Bluebird UK Bidco 2 Limited
Questions referred
1.In the context of Article 1(1)(a)(ii) of Council Directive 98/59/EC, does ‘establishment’ have the same meaning as it has in the context of Article 1(1)(a)(i) of that Directive?
2.If not, can ‘an establishment’, for the purposes of Article 1(1)(a)(ii), be constituted by an organisational sub-unit of an undertaking which consists of or includes more than one local employment unit?
3.In Article 1(1)(a)(ii) of the Directive, does the phrase ‘at least 20’ refer to the number of dismissals across all of the employer's establishments, or does it instead refer to the number of dismissals per establishment? (In other words, is the reference to ‘20’ a reference to 20 in any particular establishment, or to 20 overall?)
Council Directive 98/59/EC of 20 July 1998 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies
OJ L 225, p. 16
*
Language of the case: English