I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-687/20) (*)
(Dumping - Imports of threaded tube or pipe cast fittings, of malleable cast iron, originating in China - Reimposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty - Legal certainty - Legitimate expectations - Non-retroactivity - Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (now Article 10 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) - Proportionality - Registration of imports - Article 14(5) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 14(5) of Regulation 2016/1036))
(2023/C 63/43)
Language of the case: English
Applicants: Jinan Meide Casting Co. Ltd (Jinan, China), and the 10 other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the judgment (represented by: R. Antonini, E. Monard and B. Maniatis, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Blanck and G. Luengo, acting as Agents)
By their action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1210 of 19 August 2020 reimposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of threaded tube or pipe cast fittings, of malleable cast iron and spheroidal graphite cast iron, originating in the People’s Republic of China, manufactured by Jinan Meide [Casting Co.] Ltd following the judgment of the General Court in Case T-650/17 (OJ 2020 L 274, p. 20).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Jinan Meide Casting Co. Ltd and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to pay the costs.
(*) Language of the case: English.