- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-392/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Baranya Megyei Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 5 October 2009 — Uszodaépítő Kft. v APEH Központi Hivatal Hatósági Főosztály
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009CN0392
62009CN0392
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
16.1.2010
Official Journal of the European Union
C 11/13
(Case C-392/09)
2010/C 11/23
Language of the case: Hungarian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Uszodaépítő Kft.
Defendant: APEH Központi Hivatal Hatósági Főosztály
Questions referred
1.Is a provision of a law of a Member State, which entered into force on 1 January 2008, after the right to deduct had arisen, and which, for the purposes of the deduction of VAT paid and declared in relation to supplies of goods or services made in the 2007 financial year, requires the amendment of the content of invoices and the submission of a supplementary declaration, compatible with Articles 17 and 20 of the Sixth Directive? (1)
2.Is the measure laid down by Paragraph 269(1) of the new VAT Law, according to which, if the requirements set out in the previous question are complied with, rights and obligations must be determined and applied in accordance with the provisions of that Law, even where they arose before the entry into force thereof, within the limitation period, compatible with the general principles of Community law, and, in particular, is it objectively justifiable, reasonable, proportionate and consistent with the principle of legal certainty?
(1) Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment OJ 1997 L 145, p. 1.