- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-308/11: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 September 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt am Main — Germany) — Chemische Fabrik Kreussler & Co. GmbH v Sunstar Deutschland GmbH, formerly John O. Butler GmbH (Directive 2001/83/EC — Medicinal products for human use — Article 1(2)(b) — Meaning of ‘medicinal product by function’ — Definition of the term ‘pharmacological action’ )
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011CA0308
62011CA0308
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.10.2012
Official Journal of the European Union
C 331/9
(Case C-308/11) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Directive 2001/83/EC - Medicinal products for human use - Article 1(2)(b) - Meaning of ‘medicinal product by function’ - Definition of the term ‘pharmacological action’)
(2012/C 331/13)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Chemische Fabrik Kreussler & Co. GmbH
Defendant: Sunstar Deutschland GmbH, formerly John O. Butler GmbH
Re:
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt am Main — Interpretation of Article 1(2)(b) of Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use (OJ 2001 L 311, p. 67), as amended by Directive 2004/27/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 (OJ 2004 L 136, p. 34) — Classification of a product as a medicinal product — Mouthwash containing 0,12 % chlorhexidine — Definition of ‘pharmacological action’
Operative part of the judgment
1.Article 1(2)(b) of Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use, as amended by Directive 2004/27/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004, must be interpreted as meaning that, for the purpose of defining the term ‘pharmacological action’ within the meaning of that provision, account may be taken of the definition of that term in the Guidance Document on the demarcation between the Cosmetic Products Directive 76/768 and the Medicinal Products Directive 2001/83 as agreed between the Commission services and the competent authorities of the Member States.
2.Article 1(2)(b) of Directive 2001/83 must be interpreted as meaning that, for a substance to be regarded as exerting a ‘pharmacological action’ within the meaning of that provision, it is not necessary for there to be an interaction between the molecules of which it consists and a cellular constituent of the user’s body, as an interaction between that substance and any cellular constituent present within the user’s body may be sufficient.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 282, 24.9.2011.