- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-302/10: Order of the General Court of 23 November 2012 — Crocs v OHIM — Holey Soles Holdings and PHI (Representation of footwear) ( ‘Community trade mark — Invalidity action — Withdrawal of the invalidity action — No need to adjudicate’ )
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010TB0302
62010TB0302
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
26.1.2013
Official Journal of the European Union
C 26/45
Order of the General Court of 23 November 2012 — Crocs v OHIM — Holey Soles Holdings and PHI (Representation of footwear )
(Case T-302/10) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Community trade mark - Invalidity action - Withdrawal of the invalidity action - No need to adjudicate)
2013/C 26/87
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Crocs, Inc. (Niwot, United States of America) (represented by: I.R. Craig, solicitor)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Hanne, agent)
Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Holey Soles Holdings Ltd (Vancouver, Canada; and Partenaire Hospitalier International (La Haie Foissière, France)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 March 2010 (Case R 9/2008-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Holey Shoes Holdings Ltd and Partenaire Hospitalier International and Crocs, Inc.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no need to adjudicate on the action.
2.The applicant shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the defendant.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 260, 25.9.2010.