- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-283/20: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail francophone de Bruxelles — Belgium) — CO and Others v MJ, European Commission, European External Action Service (EEAS), Council of the European Union, Eulex Kosovo (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) — European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (Eulex Kosovo) — Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP — Article 8(3) and (5), Article 9(3) and Article 10(3) — Status of employer of the mission staff — Article 16(5) — Subrogation)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020CA0283
62020CA0283
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
19.4.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 165/8
(Case C-283/20) (*)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) - European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (Eulex Kosovo) - Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP - Article 8(3) and (5), Article 9(3) and Article 10(3) - Status of employer of the mission staff - Article 16(5) - Subrogation)
(2022/C 165/08)
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: CO and Others
Defendants: MJ, European Commission, European External Action Service, Council of the European Union, Eulex Kosovo
Operative part of the judgment
Article 16(5) of Council Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP of 4 February 2008 on the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo, Eulex Kosovo, as amended by Council Decision 2014/349/CFSP of 12 June 2014, must be interpreted as meaning that, starting from 15 June 2014, it designates the Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo, known as ‘Eulex Kosovo’, referred to in Article 1 of that joint action, as responsible and therefore as defendant in any action relating to the consequences of the implementation of the mission entrusted to it, irrespective of whether the facts underlying such an action occurred before 12 June 2014, the date when Decision 2014/349 entered into force.
(*)
Language of the case: French
* * *
(1) OJ C 297, 7.9.2020.
ECLI:EU:C:2022:140