I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
10.2.2025
(C/2025/744)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish
Applicant: Lico Cosmetics, SL (Seville, Spain) (represented by: K. Guridi Sedlak, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Cosmética Natural de Licopeno, SL (Badajoz, Spain)
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: Application for EU word mark LICO – Application No 18 803 899
Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 October 2024 in Case R 833/2024-4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—declare the first ground of appeal well founded and set aside the contested decision as regards those goods in Class 3 and those services in Class 35 in respect of which the applicant’s appeal was dismissed, and declare that there is no likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue also in respect of those goods and services since there are sufficient and very important differences between the signs, which rule out any likelihood of confusion;
—order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, if the latter intervenes in the present proceedings, to pay the costs.
Misinterpretation and misapplication of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/744/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—