- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-82/11: Action brought on 14 February 2011 — Formica v OHIM — Silicalia (CompacTop)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TN0082
62011TN0082
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
9.4.2011
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 113/16
(Case T-82/11)
2011/C 113/32
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Formica, SA (Galdakao, Spain) (represented by: A. Goméz López, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Silicalia, SL (Valencia, Spain)
Form of order sought
The applicant requests the Court to:
—declare as not being in accordance with Regulation EC No 207/2009 on the Community trade mark the decision of 9 December 2010 of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM, in Case R 1083/2010-1;
—allow registration of the complex Community trade mark No 6 524 243 CompacTop, in Class 20; and
—order the defendant and, if appropriate, the intervener, to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Applicant for a Community trade mark: Formica
Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark ‘CompacTop’ for goods in Class 20.
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Silicalia, SL
Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community and national figurative marks containing the word elements ‘COMPACquartz’, ‘COMPACMARMOL&QUARTZ’ and ‘COMPAC MARMOL&QUARTZ’ for goods and services in Classes 19, 27, 35, 37 and 39.
Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld.
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed.
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1) since there is no similarity or likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue.
Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1)