I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(C/2025/1637)
Language of the case: Spanish
Appellant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castilla Contreras and M. Salyková, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings: Kingdom of Spain
The appellant claims that the Court should:
—Set aside point 1 of the operative part of the judgment under appeal in so far as it upholds the second part of the first plea in law;
—Dismiss the second part of the first plea in law as unfounded;
—Refer the case back to the General Court for a ruling on the fifth and sixth parts of the first plea in law and on the second plea in law; and
—Order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.
—The first ground of appeal concerns an error in application of the rules on administration of the burden of proof in the context of the clearance of accounts procedure under Article 52(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 352/78, (EC) No 165/94, (EC) No 2799/98, (EC) No 814/2000, (EC) No 1290/2005 and (EC) No 485/2008.
—The second ground of appeal concerns an error of law in the interpretation of the obligations on Member States in relation to application of the statutory management requirements (‘SMR’) and the checks in order to verify compliance with those SMR by farmers, in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 352/78, (EC) No 165/94, (EC) No 2799/98, (EC) No 814/2000, (EC) No 1290/2005 and (EC) No 485/2008.
—
(1) OJ 2013 L 347, p. 549.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1637/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—