- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-546/16: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 September 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Órgano Administrativo de Recursos Contractuales de la Comunidad Autónoma de Euskadi — Spain) — Montte SL v Musikene (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 267 TFEU — Jurisdiction of the Court — Whether the referring body qualifies as a court or tribunal — Directive 2014/24/EU — Public procurement procedures — Open procedure — Award criteria — Technical evaluation — Minimum score threshold — Price-based evaluation)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016CA0546
62016CA0546
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
12.11.2018
Official Journal of the European Union
C 408/7
(Case C-546/16) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 267 TFEU - Jurisdiction of the Court - Whether the referring body qualifies as a court or tribunal - Directive 2014/24/EU - Public procurement procedures - Open procedure - Award criteria - Technical evaluation - Minimum score threshold - Price-based evaluation))
(2018/C 408/06)
Language of the case: Spanish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: Montte SL
Respondent: Musikene
Operative part of the judgment
1.Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which allows contracting authorities to lay down, in the documents governing an open procurement procedure, minimum requirements as regards the technical evaluation, so that the tenders submitted which do not reach a predetermined minimum score threshold at the end of that evaluation are excluded from the subsequent evaluation based on both technical criteria and price.
2.Article 66 of Directive 2014/24 must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which allows contracting authorities to lay down, in the documents governing an open procurement procedure, minimum requirements as regards the technical evaluation, so that the tenders submitted which do not reach a predetermined minimum score threshold at the end of that evaluation are excluded from the subsequent stages of the procurement procedure, regardless of the number of tenderers remaining.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 22, 23.1.2017.