- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-53/23, Asociaţia Forumul Judecătorilor din România (Associations of judges): Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Piteşti - Romania) - Asociația Forumul Judecătorilor din România, Asociația Mișcarea pentru Apărarea Statutului Procurorilor v Parchetul de pe lângă Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie – Procurorul General al României (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rule of law – Judicial independence – Article 19(1) TEU – Cooperation and Verification Mechanism – Benchmarks subscribed to by Romania – Fight against corruption – Investigations of offences committed within the judicial system – Action challenging the nomination of prosecutors with competence to conduct those investigations – Standing of professional associations of judges to bring proceedings)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CA0053
62023CA0053
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/3726
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Piteşti - Romania) - Asociația ‘Forumul Judecătorilor din România’, Asociația ‘Mișcarea pentru Apărarea Statutului Procurorilor’ v Parchetul de pe lângă Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie – Procurorul General al României
(Case C-53/23,
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Rule of law - Judicial independence - Article 19(1) TEU - Cooperation and Verification Mechanism - Benchmarks subscribed to by Romania - Fight against corruption - Investigations of offences committed within the judicial system - Action challenging the nomination of prosecutors with competence to conduct those investigations - Standing of professional associations of judges to bring proceedings)
(C/2024/3726)
Language of the case: Romanian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: Asociația ‘Forumul Judecătorilor din România’, Asociația ‘Mișcarea pentru Apărarea Statutului Procurorilor’
Defendant: Parchetul de pe lângă Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie - Procurorul General al României
Operative part of the judgment
Article 2 and Article 19(1) TEU, read in combination with Articles 12 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which, by making the admissibility of an action for annulment challenging the appointment of prosecutors competent to conduct criminal prosecutions against judges subject to the existence of a legitimate private interest, excludes, in practice, such an action from being brought by professional associations of judges seeking to defend the principle of the independence of the judiciary.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3726/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
*
Language of the case: Romanian.