EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.
Case T-317/15: Action brought on 18 June 2015 — Italy v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TN0317
62015TN0317
June 18, 2015
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 254/21
(Case T-317/15)
(2015/C 254/24)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: P. Gentili, avvocato dello Stato, and G. Palmieri, acting as Agent)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the notice of competition EPSO/AD/302/15 — Administrators (AD 5) in the field of Audit;
—order the Commission to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
The pleas in law and main arguments relied on by the applicant are those raised in Case T-17/15 Italian Republic v Commission (OJ 2015 C 81, p. 27).
EurLex Case Law
AI-Powered Case Law Search
Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions
Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free TrialAt Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.