I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Series C
(Case T-538/19) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Commission decision ordering an inspection - Withdrawal of the contested measure - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2024/470)
Language of the case: French
Applicant: Casino, Guichard-Perrachon (Saint-Étienne, France) (represented by: I. Simic and Y. Boubacir, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Berghe and I. Rogalski, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: O. Segnana and A.-L. Meyer, acting as Agents)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Decision C(2019) 3761 final of 13 May 2019, ordering it and all companies directly or indirectly controlled by it to submit to an inspection under Article 20(1) and (4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (AT.40466 — Tute 1).
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.The European Commission is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Casino, Guichard-Perrachon.
3.The Council of the European Union shall bear its own costs.
Language of the case: French.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/470/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
*