- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-386/08: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 1 September 2008 — Brita GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Hafen
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008CN0386
62008CN0386
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 285/26
(Case C-386/08)
(2008/C 285/43)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Brita GmbH
Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Hafen
Questions referred
4. May the customs authority refuse automatically to grant preferential treatment under the EMA in the case where — as has become clear in the meantime — the goods originate in the West Bank, or should preferential treatment also be granted under the EMA for goods originating in that area, in any event as long as no dispute-settlement procedure has been carried out under Article 33 of Protocol 4 to the EMA concerning the interpretation of the expression ‘territory of the State of Israel’ used in the EMA?
(1) OJ 2000 L 147, p. 3.
(2) OJ 1997 L 187, p. 3.