I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
—
(2015/C 245/53)
Language of the case: French
Appellant: Ángel Coedo Suárez (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)
Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union
The appellant claims that the Court should:
—declare the present appeal admissible;
—set aside the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 26 March 2015 in Coedo Suárez v Council (F-38/14, EU:F:2015:25);
—grant the application for annulment made by the appellant at first instance;
—order the Council to pay the costs of both sets of proceedings.
In support of the appeal, the appellant relies on two pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging a distortion of the facts and evidence, and an error of law, in that the Civil Service Tribunal held that the appointing authority had not committed a manifest error of assessment in finding that the appellant’s ill health did not constitute an extenuating circumstance.
2.Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the duty to state reasons.
—