EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-266/23, Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Bydgoszczy: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Poland) lodged on 26 April 2023 — A. S.A. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Bydgoszczy

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0266

62023CN0266

April 26, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

7.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 278/16

(Case C-266/23, Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Bydgoszczy)

(2023/C 278/24)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: A. S.A.

Respondent: Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Bydgoszczy

Questions referred

1.Can Article 17(1)(a) of Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity (1) be understood as meaning that only the purchase price of the electricity itself, to the exclusion of any additional charges, for example a distribution charge, which must be borne under the legislation in force in a Member State in order to purchase electricity, must be included in the actual cost of the energy purchased?

2.Must Article 17(1)(a) of Directive 2003/96 be interpreted as precluding the exclusion of an exemption from excise duty on the purchase of electricity for an energy-intensive business [Article 31d(1) of the Ustawa z 6 grudnia 2008 r. o podatku akcyzowym (Law of 6 December 2008 on excise duty (Dz. U. of 2022, item 143)] in the event that that business benefits from an object-specific exemption from excise duty under national legislation (Article 30(7a) of the Law on excise duty), when that business demonstrates that, in relation to the same energy, it does not benefit from those two exemptions simultaneously, and assuming that the total amount of the exemptions does not exceed the amount of excise duty paid for the same period of time?

(1) OJ 2003 L 283, p. 51.

Language of the case: Polish

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia