- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-909/19: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 October 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Iaşi — Romania) — BX v Unitatea Administrativ Teritorială D. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of the safety and health of workers — Directive 2003/88/EC — Organisation of working time — Article 2(1) and (2) — Concepts of ‘working time’ and ‘rest period’ — Mandatory vocational training undertaken at the employer’s request)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CA0909
62019CA0909
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 2/4
(Case C-909/19) (1)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Protection of the safety and health of workers - Directive 2003/88/EC - Organisation of working time - Article 2(1) and (2) - Concepts of ‘working time’ and ‘rest period’ - Mandatory vocational training undertaken at the employer’s request)
(2022/C 2/05)
Language of the case: Romanian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: BX
Defendant: Unitatea Administrativ Teritorială D.
Operative part of the judgment
Article 2(1) of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time must be interpreted as meaning that the period during which a worker attends vocational training required by his or her employer, which takes place away from his or her usual place of work, at the premises of the training services provider, during which he or she does not perform his or her normal duties, constitutes ‘working time’ within the meaning of that provision.
(1) OJ C 201, 15.6.2020.