- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-75/13: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 13 February 2014 — Probst v Commission (Staff cases — Officials — Expatriation allowance — Article 4 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations — Request for re-examination — Material new facts — Action manifestly inadmissible)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013FB0075
62013FB0075
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
24.11.2014
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 421/56
(Case F-75/13)(*1)
((Staff cases - Officials - Expatriation allowance - Article 4 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Request for re-examination - Material new facts - Action manifestly inadmissible))
2014/C 421/80
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Norbert Probst (Genval, Belgium) (represented by: initially, D. Abreu Caldas, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, É. Marchal and S. Orlandi, lawyers, and subsequently by D. Abreu Caldas, J.-N. Louis and S. Orlandi, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and V. Joris, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the decision not to grant the applicant the benefit of the expatriation allowance.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.
2.Mr Probst shall bear his own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.
(*1) OJ C 274 of 21/09/2013, p. 34.