EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-408/23, Anwaltsnotarin: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 4 July 2023 — Rechtsanwältin (lawyer) and Notarin (notary) v the President of the Oberlandesgericht Hamm

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0408

62023CN0408

July 4, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

11.9.2023

Official Journal of the European Union

C 321/29

(Case C-408/23, Anwaltsnotarin)

(2023/C 321/36)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Rechtsanwältin (lawyer) and Notarin (notary)

Defendant: the President of the Oberlandesgericht Hamm

Questions referred

1.Are Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Article 6(1) of Council Directive 2000/78/EC (1) of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation to be interpreted as precluding national legislation which provides in mandatory terms that a person who has reached the age of 60 on expiry of the deadline for applications to the notary post in question cannot be appointed for the first time to the role of Anwaltsnotar (lawyer commissioned as notary), even if more than one post must remain vacant because there are no suitable younger candidates in the local court district in which the application procedure took place and candidates from other local court districts are not permitted to apply?

2.Is question 1 to be answered in the affirmative if it is to be expected that more than one advertised post of lawyer commissioned as notary will be impossible to fill with suitable candidates younger than 60 in the same local court district in the following year?

3.Is question 1 to be answered in the affirmative in any event because it is also to be expected that, also in other local court districts outside large urban centres, it will repeatedly prove impossible to fill all advertised posts of lawyer commissioned as notary with suitable candidates younger than 60?

4.Is no infringement of Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Article 6(1) of Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 present if the supply of notarial services is assured in a local court district even though an applicant over 60 years of age has not been appointed to the post of lawyer commissioned as notary solely on account of his or her age and more than one post has remained vacant?

Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation (OJ 2000 L 303, p. 16).

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia