- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-303/13: Order of the General Court of 14 January 2014 — Miettinen v Council (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Opinion of the Council’s Legal Service — Refusal of access — Disclosure after the action was brought — Action becoming devoid of purpose — No legal interest in bringing proceedings — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013TB0303
62013TB0303
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
8.3.2014
Official Journal of the European Union
C 71/22
(Case T-303/13) (*)
(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Opinion of the Council’s Legal Service - Refusal of access - Disclosure after the action was brought - Action becoming devoid of purpose - No legal interest in bringing proceedings - No need to adjudicate)
(2014/C 71/40)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Samuli Miettinen (Espoo, Finland) (represented by: O. Brouwer, E. Raedts, lawyers, and A. Villette, Solicitor)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: K. Pellinghelli and É. Sitbon, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the Council’s decision of 25 March 2013 refusing to grant the applicant access to the full text of the opinion of the Council’s Legal Service, reference 15309/12.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no need to adjudicate on the action.
2.The Council of the European Union shall pay the costs.
3.There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene submitted by the Kingdom of Sweden and the Republic of Finland.
(*) Language of the case: English.
(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Opinion of the Council’s Legal Service - Refusal of access - Disclosure after the action was brought - Action becoming devoid of purpose - No legal interest in bringing proceedings - No need to adjudicate)
(2014/C 71/40)