- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-355/19: Action brought on 13 June 2019 — CE v Committee of the Regions
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TN0355
62019TN0355
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
29.7.2019
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 255/56
(Case T-355/19)
(2019/C 255/69)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: CE (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)
Defendant: Committee of the Regions
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—declare the present application admissible and well founded;
—annul the decision of 16 April 2019 and, in the alternative, annul the decision of 16 May 2019;
—order the payment of compensation in respect of the material harm incurred, amounting to the sum of EUR 19 200 non-inclusive of VAT, and compensation in respect of the non-material harm incurred, estimated to amount to the sum of EUR 83 208,24;
—order the defendant to pay all the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging an abuse of process and infringement of Articles 47 and 49 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants and of Articles 23 and 24 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union.
2.Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to fair and just working conditions, of the principle of sound administration and of the prohibition on any form of psychological harassment.
3.Third plea in law, alleging material inaccuracy and a manifest error of assessment.