- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-66/20: Judgment of the General Court of 10 March 2021 — Hauz 1929 v EUIPO — Houzz (HAUZ LONDON) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark HAUZ LONDON — Earlier EU word mark HOUZZ — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TA0066
62020TA0066
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
3.5.2021
Official Journal of the European Union
C 163/27
(Case T-66/20) (1)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark HAUZ LONDON - Earlier EU word mark HOUZZ - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2021/C 163/35)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Hauz 1929 Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: N. Lyberis, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: V. Ruzek, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Houzz, Inc. (Palo Alto, California, United States)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 November 2019 (Case R 884/2019-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Houzz and Hauz 1929.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Hauz 1929 Ltd to pay the costs.
(1) OJ C 95, 23.3.2020.