EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-490/07: Judgment of the General Court of 17 December 2009 — Notartel v OHIM — SAT.1 (R.U.N.) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark R.U.N. — Earlier Community and national word marks ran — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Obligation to state reasons — Article 73 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009) — Partial refusal of registration)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62007TA0490

62007TA0490

December 17, 2009
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

13.2.2010

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/34

(Case T-490/07) (<span class="super">1</span>)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark R.U.N. - Earlier Community and national word marks ‘ran’ - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) - Obligation to state reasons - Article 73 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009) - Partial refusal of registration)

2010/C 37/45

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Notartel SpA — Società informatica del Notariato (Rome, Italy) (represented by: M. Bosshard and M. Balestriero, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Sempio, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: SAT.1 SatellitenFernsehen GmbH (Berlin, Germany)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 October 2007 (Case R 1267/2006-4) concerning opposition proceedings between SAT.1 SatellitenFernsehen GmbH and Notartel SpA — Società informatica del Notariato

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders Notartel SpA — Società informatica del Notariato to pay the costs.

(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 64, 8.3.2008.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia