- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-289/20: Action brought on 15 May 2020 — Facegym v EUIPO (FACEGYM)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TN0289
62020TN0289
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.7.2020
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 247/26
(Case T-289/20)
(2020/C 247/36)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Facegym Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: M. Edenborough, QC)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark FACEGYM — Application for registration No. W1 466 456
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 February 2020 in Case R 70/2020-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
alternatively
—alter the contested decision so that it is now held that the allegedly offending goods and services of the International Trade Mark Registration do not offend against Article 7(1)(b) or (c);
—order EUIPO to pay the applicant’s costs of and occasioned by this application and the costs below.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) or (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.