EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-178/18: Order of the General Court of 28 February 2019 — Région de Bruxelles-Capitale v Commission (Action for annulment — Plant-protection products — Active substance glyphosate — Renewal of inclusion in the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TB0178

62018TB0178

February 28, 2019
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

15.4.2019

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/55

(Case T-178/18) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)

(Action for annulment - Plant-protection products - Active substance glyphosate - Renewal of inclusion in the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility)

(2019/C 139/56)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Région de Bruxelles-Capitale (represented by: A. Bailleux and B. Magarinos Rey, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre, A. Lewis, I. Naglis and G. Koleva, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking the annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2324 of 12 December 2017 renewing the approval of the active substance glyphosate in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011(OJ 2017 L 333, p.10).

Operative part of the order

1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene of Justice Pesticides, the Walloon Region, Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe), Health & Environment Alliance (HEAL), Nature & Progrès Belgique (Nature & Progrès), SomeOfUs, WeMove Europe (WeMove.EU), Monsanto Europe NV/SA, Monsanto Company, Helm AG, Barclay Chemicals Manufacturing Ltd, Albaugh Europe Sàrl, Albaugh TKI D.O.O. and Albaugh UK Ltd.

3.The Région de Bruxelles-Capitale shall bear its own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

4.The Région de Bruxelles-Capitale, the Commission, Justice Pesticides, the Walloon Region, PAN Europe, HEAL, Nature & Progrès, SomeOfUs, WeMove.EU, Monsanto Europe, Monsanto Company, Helm, Barclay Chemicals Manufacturing, Albaugh Europe, Albaugh TKI D.O.O. and Albaugh UK shall each bear their own costs in relation to the applications to intervene.

(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 190, 4.6.2018.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia