I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-196/13) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark ‘la nana’ - Earlier national word mark NANA - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - No genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 57(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009))
2014/C 292/52
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp GmbH & Co. KG (Bremen, Germany) (represented by: T. Boddien, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Pohlmann, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Lina M. Stal-Florez Botero (Maarssen, Netherlands)
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 January 2013 (Case R 300/2012-1) relating to invalidity proceedings between Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp GmbH & Co. KG and Lina M. Stal-Florez Botero.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.