I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
—
(2016/C 175/04)
Language of the case: English
Appellant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: O. Mondéjar Ortuño and E. Zaera Cuadrado, Agents)
Other parties to the proceedings: Instituto dos Vinhos do Douro e do Porto, IP, Bruichladdich Distillery Co.Ltd
The appellant claims that the Court should:
—uphold the appeal in its entirety;
—annul the judgment under appeal;
—order the applicant before the General Court to pay the costs.
The General Court infringed Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1), read in conjunction with Article 8(4), and Article 53(2)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 by considering that the protection conferred by Regulation (EC) No 491/2009 (2) to registered designations of origin can be supplemented by Decreto-Lei No 173/2009 and Decreto-Lei No 212/2004 and the Portuguese Intellectual Property Code.
—
Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark OJ L 78, p. 1.
—
Council Regulation (EC) No 491/2009 of 25 May 2009 amending Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 establishing a common organization of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) OJ L 154, p. 1.
—