I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
C series
8.4.2024
(C/2024/2454)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Qx World Kft. (Budapest, Hungary) (represented by: Á. László and A. Cserny, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: SC Scio International SRL (Sânmartin, Romania)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark SCIO THETA — European Union trade mark No 15 490 717
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 December 2023 in joined cases R 1054/2021-4 and R 1080/2021-4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision insofar as it rejected the applicant’s appeal and cross-appeal;
—remit the case to EUIPO’s Boards of Appeal.
—Infringement of Article 67 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 68(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, as well as of the essential procedural requirement for respect of the applicant’s rights to good administration, a remedy and to be heard.