EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-100/24: Action brought on 21 February 2024 — Qx World v EUIPO — Scio International (SCIO THETA)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0100

62024TN0100

February 21, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2024/2454

8.4.2024

(Case T-100/24)

(C/2024/2454)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Qx World Kft. (Budapest, Hungary) (represented by: Á. László and A. Cserny, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: SC Scio International SRL (Sânmartin, Romania)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark SCIO THETA — European Union trade mark No 15 490 717

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 December 2023 in joined cases R 1054/2021-4 and R 1080/2021-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the contested decision insofar as it rejected the applicant’s appeal and cross-appeal;

remit the case to EUIPO’s Boards of Appeal.

Pleas in law

Infringement of Article 67 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

Infringement of Article 68(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, as well as of the essential procedural requirement for respect of the applicant’s rights to good administration, a remedy and to be heard.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia