- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-20/24: Action brought on 15 January 2024 — Cinkciarz.pl v EUIPO (€$ We Think for You)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0020
62024TN0020
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
Series C
C/2024/1709
(Case T-20/24)
(C/2024/1709)
Language of the case: Polish
Parties
Applicant: Cinkciarz.pl sp. z o.o. (Zielona Góra, Poland) (represented by: E. Skrzydło-Tefelska and M. Stępkowski, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark €$ We Think for You — Application No 15 225 253
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 November 2023 in Case R 1256/2023-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b), read in conjunction with Article 7(2), of Regulation 2017/1001;
—Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001, read in conjunction with Article 41(1) and (2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union by violating the principle of good administration and the right to be heard.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1709/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)