I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
2014/C 245/09
Language of the case: Swedish
Applicant: Skatteverket
Defendant: David Hedqvist
1.Is Article 2(1) of the VAT Directive to be interpreted as meaning that transactions in the form of what has been designated as the exchange of virtual currency for traditional currency and vice versa, which is effected for consideration added by the supplier when the exchange rates are determined, constitute the supply of a service effected for consideration?
2.If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, is Article 135(1) to be interpreted as meaning that the abovementioned exchange transactions are tax exempt?
Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax. (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).
* * *
Language of the case: Swedish.