I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Language of the case: French
Applicant: VV (represented by: F. Moyse, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
—Annul the decision of 19 June 2017 and, in so far as necessary, the rejection of the applicant’s claim of 18 January 2018;
—Order the defendant to pay the costs.
By the present action, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the selection board of Open Competition EPSO/AD/322/16 — Administrators in the field of audit (AD 5/AD 7) (OJ 2016 C 171A, p. 1) not to admit her to that competition since she does not hold a university diploma attesting to completed studies of at least 3 years in the fields set out in the notice of that competition.
In support of her action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging an insufficient statement of reasons of the contested decision.
2.Second plea in law, alleging errors of assessment committed by the selection board in the evaluation of the information in the applicant’s application. The selection board disregarded the notice of competition in finding that the applicant did not have a level of education which corresponds to completed university studies of at least 3 years attested by a final diploma, required for admission to the competition.