I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Action for annulment — State aid — Shipbuilding — Aid granted by the Greek authorities to a shipyard — Measures implementing the Commission’s decision finding the aid incompatible with the common market and ordering that it be repaid — Inadmissibility
3. Proceedings — Measures of organisation of procedure — Request for production of documents — Documents constituting the contested decision — Documents not identified by the applicant — Inadmissibility of the application (Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Arts 44(1)(c), 64 and 65) (see paras 28, 29)
APPLICATION for the annulment of Commission letter C(2010) 8274 final of 1 December 2010 relating to ‘State aid case CR 16/2004 — Implementation of the negative Decision with recovery concerning State aid in favour of [the company Ellinika Nafpigeia AE] — Invocation by Greece of Article 346 paragraph 1(b) TFEU and proceedings under Article 348 paragraph 1 TFEU’, as supplemented by the documents and other material on the file of which the applicants became partially aware in June 2011.
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.There is no need to adjudicate on the application by Nafpigikes kai viomichanikes epicheiriseis Elefsinas for leave to intervene.
4.The applicant for leave to intervene, Nafpigikes kai viomichanikes epicheiriseis Elefsinas, is ordered to bear its own costs.