I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Recruitment - Selection procedure EXT/22/08/AD 6/DTD–Business Analyst - Decision not to admit the applicant to the next stage of the procedure - Action for annulment - Rule of correspondence - Article 91(2) of the Staff Regulations - Admissibility - Manifest error of assessment - Liability)
(C/2025/265)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: WS (represented by: H. Tettenborn, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė and E. Lekan, acting as Agents)
By his action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the Selection Committee of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 30 June 2022, taken in the context of procedure EXT/22/08/AD 6/DTD–Business Analyst, not to admit him to the next stage of that procedure and, secondly, compensation in respect of the moral and immaterial damage he claims to have suffered.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders WS to pay the costs.
—
Language of the case: English.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/265/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 261, 24.7.2023.
—
—