- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-644/21: Action brought on 4 October 2021 — Pharmadom v EUIPO — Wellbe Pharmaceuticals (WellBe PHARMACEUTICALS)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TN0644
62021TN0644
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
24.1.2022
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 37/35
(Case T-644/21)
(2022/C 37/48)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Pharmadom (Boulogne-Billancourt, France) (represented by: M-P. Dauquaire, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Wellbe Pharmaceuticals S.A. (Warsaw, Poland)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark WellBe PHARMACEUTICALS — Application for registration No 17 151 176
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 July 2021 in Case R 1423/2020-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision.
Plea in law
Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.