EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.
Case C-146/09: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 24 April 2009 — Prof. Dr. Claus Scholl v Stadtwerke Aachen AG
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009CN0146
62009CN0146
January 1, 2009
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 153/26
(Case C-146/09)
2009/C 153/49
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Prof. Dr. Claus Scholl
Defendant: Stadtwerke Aachen AG
Question referred
Is the third example in the third indent of Article 6(3) of Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 1997 on the protection of consumers in respect of distance contracts to be interpreted as meaning that there is no right of withdrawal in respect of distance contracts for the mains supply of electricity and gas?
(1) OJ 1997 L 144, p. 19.
EurLex Case Law
AI-Powered Case Law Search
Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions
Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free TrialAt Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.