I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Appeal - Community trade mark - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Absolute grounds for refusal - Lack of distinctiveness - Word mark ‘map&guide’)
(2008/C 51/49)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: PTV Planung Transport Verkehr AG (represented by: F. Nielsen, Rechtsanswalt)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: M.G. Schneider, Agent)
Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 10 October 2006 in Case T-302/03, PTV v OHIM (map&guide), dismissing the action for annulment of the decision which refused the application for registration of the word mark ‘map&guide’ in respect of certain goods and services in Classes 9, 41 and 42 — Distinctiveness of the mark
1.The appeal is dismissed.
2.PTV Planung Transport Verkehr AG is ordered to pay the costs.
* * *
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 42, 24.2.2007.
Language of the case: German