- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-687/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Mons (Belgium) lodged on 18 September 2019 — Ryanair Ltd v PJ
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CN0687
62019CN0687
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
25.11.2019
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 399/33
(Case C-687/19)
(2019/C 399/38)
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Ryanair Ltd
Defendant: PJ
Question referred
Must Article 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 889/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 May 2002 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 on air carrier liability in the event of accidents, (1) and therefore Article 17(1) of the Montreal Convention of 28 May 1999 for the Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage by Air, be interpreted as precluding the payment of compensation for a psychological injury, such as post-traumatic stress, on the basis of those provisions?
(1) OJ 2002 L 140, p. 2.
* * *
Language of the case: French.