I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2018/C 399/71)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: Atos Medical GmbH (Troisdorf, Germany) (represented by: K. Middelhoff, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Andreas Fahl Medizintechnik-Vertrieb GmbH (Cologne, Germany)
Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Design at issue: Community design No 1339246-0009
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 June 2018 in Case R 2215/2016-3
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs,
Should the other party intervene in the proceedings, the applicant further claims that the Court should:
—order the other party to bear its own costs.
—Infringement of Article 4(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Articles 5 and 6 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Article 25(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.