- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-121/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale civile e penale di Cagliari (Italy) lodged on 29 February 2016 — Salumificio Murru SpA v Autotrasporti di Marongiu Remigio
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016CN0121
62016CN0121
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 200/5
(Case C-121/16)
(2016/C 200/08)
Language of the case: Italian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Salumificio Murru SpA
Defendant: Autotrasporti di Marongiu Remigio
Questions referred
1.Must Article 101 TFEU, in conjunction with Article 4(3) TEU, be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that provided for in Article 83bis(10) of Legislative Decree 112/2008, in so far as the price of road haulage services on behalf of third parties may not be lower than minimum operating costs determined by the Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport and is not left to be freely determined by the contracting parties?
2.In the light of the Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport’s status of public authority, may the competition rules in the internal market be restricted by the national legislation in order to pursue the aim of maintaining road safety?