- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-521/20: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 April 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich — Austria) — J.P. v B.d.S.L. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Directive 1999/62/EC — Charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures — Tolls — Non-payment — Penalties — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 50 — Ne bis in idem principle — Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure — Lack of sufficient information — No link between the interpretation of EU law sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose — Manifest inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020CB0521
62020CB0521
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 359/13
(Case C-521/20) (*)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Directive 1999/62/EC - Charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures - Tolls - Non-payment - Penalties - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Article 50 - Ne bis in idem principle - Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure - Lack of sufficient information - No link between the interpretation of EU law sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2022/C 359/16)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Complainant: J.P.
Defendant authority: B.d.S.L.
Operative part of the order
The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich (Regional Administrative Court, Upper Austria, Austria), by decision of 15 October 2020, is manifestly inadmissible.
(*)
Language of the case: German.
* * *
ECLI:EU:C:2022:140