I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2018/C 182/32)
Language in which the application was lodged: Italian
Applicant: Piaggio & C. SpA (Pontedera, Italy) (represented by: F. Jacobacci, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Zhejiang Zhongneng Industry Group Co. Ltd (Taizhou, China)
Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Design at issue: Community design No 1 783 655-0002
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 January 2018 in Case R 1496/2015-3
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—declare the proprietor’s Community design registered under No 1 783 655-0002 invalid, on all the grounds set out in the present application;
—order the defendant and the proprietor to pay the procedural costs relating to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, pursuant to Article 190 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court;
—order EUIPO and the potential other party to the present proceedings to pay the entirety of the costs of the proceedings.
—Incorrect interpretation and application of Article 6 CDR;
—Infringement of Article 25(1)(e) CDR;
—Infringement of Article 25(1)(f) CDR.