I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
C series
—
30.9.2024
(C/2024/5657)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Glaxo Group Ltd (Brentford, United Kingdom) (represented by: T. de Haan, F. Verhoestraete and S. Vandezande, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Cipla Europe NV (Antwerp, Belgium)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: European Union tridimensional mark (Shape of an inhaler) –European Union trade mark No 2 179 562
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 June 2024 in Case R 1835/2016-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Primarily, alter the contested decision and reject the application for a declaration of invalidity in its entirety;
—In the alternative, set aside the contested decision; and
—In any event, order EUIPO and the intervener to bear the costs, including those incurred by the applicant before the Office’s Second Board of Appeal.
—Infringement of Article 51(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94;
—Infringement of Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 ;
—Infringement of Article 51(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 ;
—Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and of Article 41(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5657/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—