EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-432/24: Action brought on 20 August 2024 – Glaxo Group v EUIPO – Cipla Europe (Shape of an inhaler)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0432

62024TN0432

August 20, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2024/5657

30.9.2024

(Case T-432/24)

(C/2024/5657)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Glaxo Group Ltd (Brentford, United Kingdom) (represented by: T. de Haan, F. Verhoestraete and S. Vandezande, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Cipla Europe NV (Antwerp, Belgium)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union tridimensional mark (Shape of an inhaler) –European Union trade mark No 2 179 562

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 June 2024 in Case R 1835/2016-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Primarily, alter the contested decision and reject the application for a declaration of invalidity in its entirety;

In the alternative, set aside the contested decision; and

In any event, order EUIPO and the intervener to bear the costs, including those incurred by the applicant before the Office’s Second Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law

Infringement of Article 51(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94;

Infringement of Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 ;

Infringement of Article 51(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 ;

Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and of Article 41(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5657/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia