- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-672/18: Order of the General Court of 22 November 2019 — Pyke v EUIPO — Paglieri (CLIOMAKEUP) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TB0672
62018TB0672
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.1.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 27/34
(Case T-672/18) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)
(2020/C 27/42)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Pyke Srl (Milan, Italy) (represented by: P. Roncaglia, F. Rossi, N. Parrotta and R. Perotti, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: L. Rampini, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Paglieri SpA (Alessandria, Italy) (represented by: A. Perani and G. Ghisletti, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 August 2018 (Case 2675/2017-5) relating to opposition proceedings between Paglieri and Pyke.
Operative part
1)There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2)Pyke Srl and Paglieri SpA shall bear their own costs, and each pay half of the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 25, 21.1.2019.
* Language of the case: Italian.