EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-116/22: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 21 September 2023 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Environment — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Article 4(4) and Article 6(1) — Failure to designate special areas of conservation — Failure to determine conservation objectives — Absence or insufficiency of conservation measures — Administrative practice)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CA0116

62022CA0116

September 21, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2023/626

13.11.2023

(Case C-116/22) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Environment - Directive 92/43/EEC - Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora - Article 4(4) and Article 6(1) - Failure to designate special areas of conservation - Failure to determine conservation objectives - Absence or insufficiency of conservation measures - Administrative practice)

(C/2023/626)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: C. Hermes and M. Noll-Ehlers, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: J. Möller and A. Hoesch, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Declares that, by failing to designate as special areas of conservation 88 of the 4 606 sites of Community importance which were placed on the list established by Commission Decision 2004/69/EC of 22 December 2003 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, the list of sites of Community importance for the Alpine biogeographical region, the list established by Commission Decision 2004/798/EC of 7 December 2004 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, the list of sites of Community importance for the Continental biogeographical region, and the list established by Commission Decision 2004/813/EC of 7 December 2004 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, the list of sites of Community importance for the Atlantic biogeographical region, updated respectively by Commission Decision 2008/218/EC of 25 January 2008 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, a first updated list of sites of Community importance for the Alpine biogeographical region, Commission Decision 2008/25/EC of 13 November 2007 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, a first updated list of sites of Community importance for the Continental biogeographical region, and Commission Decision 2008/23/EC of 12 November 2007 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, a first updated list of sites of Community importance for the Atlantic biogeographical region, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 4(4) of Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, as amended by Council Directive 2013/17/EU of 13 May 2013;

2.Declares that, by failing to adopt detailed conservation objectives for the group of 88 sites among the 4 606 sites of Community importance referred to in point 1 of the operative part, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 4(4) of Directive 92/43, as amended by Directive 2013/17;

3.Declares that, by failing to adopt the necessary conservation measures for the group of 737 sites among the 4 606 sites of Community importance referred to in point 1 of the operative part, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 6(1) of Directive 92/43, as amended by Directive 2013/17;

4.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

5.Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

*

Language of the case: German.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/626/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

OJ C 148, 4.4.2022

ECLI:EU:C:2025:140

15

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia