I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2023/C 189/50)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: IU Internationale Hochschule GmbH (Erfurt, Germany) (represented by: A. Heise, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark IU International University of Applied Sciences — Application No 1 628 092
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 February 2023 in Case R 1951/2022-1
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 72(2) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 72(2) in conjunction with Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.