- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-117/09 P: Order of the Court of 24 June 2010 — Kronoply GmbH & Co. KG v European Commission (Appeal — State aid — Application for aid intended to amend aid previously granted to the recipient undertaking and notified to the Commission after the investment project had been fully completed — Criteria of the incentive effect and of necessity)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009CB0117
62009CB0117
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
18.12.2010
Official Journal of the European Union
C 346/21
(Case C-117/09 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Appeal - State aid - Application for aid intended to amend aid previously granted to the recipient undertaking and notified to the Commission after the investment project had been fully completed - Criteria of the incentive effect and of necessity)
2010/C 346/35
Language of the case: German
Parties
Appellant: Kronoply GmbH & Co. KG (represented by: R. Nierer and L. Gordalla, Rechtsanwälte)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: K. Gross, V. Kreuschitz and T. Scharf, acting as Agents)
Re:
Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 14 January 2009 in Case T-162/06 Kronoply v Commission by which the Court dismissed the application for annulment of Commission Decision 2006/262/EC of 21 September 2005 declaring State aid which Germany is planning to implement for the appellant to be incompatible with the common market (OJ 2006 L 94, p. 50) — Proposed aid intended to amend aid previously granted to the recipient undertaking notified to the Commission after the investment project had been fully completed by means of the aid initially approved — Incorrect assessment of the incentive effect and of the necessity of the aid at issue
Operative part of the order
1.The appeal is dismissed.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 141, 20.6.2009.