- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-197/20: Judgment of the General Court of 14 July 2021 — JT v EUIPO — Carrasco Pirard (QUILAPAYÚN) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark QUILAPAYÚN — Relative ground for refusal — No well-known mark within the meaning of Article 6bis of the Paris Convention — Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TA0197
62020TA0197
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
13.9.2021
Official Journal of the European Union
C 368/21
(Case T-197/20) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark QUILAPAYÚN - Relative ground for refusal - No well-known mark within the meaning of Article 6bis of the Paris Convention - Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(2021/C 368/34)
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: JT (represented by: A. Mena Valenzuela, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: R. Raponi and D. Hanf, acting as Agents)
Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Eduardo Carrasco Pirard (Santiago, Chile) and the seven other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO whose names are listed in the annex to the judgment
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 February 2020 (Case R 1518/2019-4), relating to opposition proceedings between, on the one hand, JT and, on the other hand, Mr Carrasco Pirard and the other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO whose names are listed in the annex.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders JT to pay the costs.
(*) Language of the case: Spanish.
ECLI:EU:C:2021:368
* * *
(1) OJ C 320, 28.9.2020.