- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-200/11 P: Order of the Court of 22 March 2012 — Italian Republic v European Commission (Appeal — Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure — State aid — Incompatibility with the common market — Commission decision — Action for annulment — Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 — Article 1(c) — Alteration of existing aid — Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 — Article 4(1) — Temporary defensive mechanism for shipbuilding)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011CB0200
62011CB0200
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
30.6.2012
Official Journal of the European Union
C 194/7
(Case C-200/11 P)(<span class="super">1</span>)
(Appeal - Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure - State aid - Incompatibility with the common market - Commission decision - Action for annulment - Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 - Article 1(c) - Alteration of existing aid - Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 - Article 4(1) - Temporary defensive mechanism for shipbuilding)
2012/C 194/11
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Appellant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, agent, P. Gentili, avvocato dello Stato)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci and C. Urraca Caviedes, agents)
Re:
Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 February 2011 in Case T-3/09 Italy v Commission, by which the General Court dismissed an application for annulment of Commission Decision 2010/38/EC of 21 October 2008 on State aid C 20/08 (ex N 62/08) which Italy is planning to implement through a modification of scheme N 59/04 concerning a temporary defensive mechanism for shipbuilding (OJ 2010 L 17, p. 50)
Operative part of the order
1.The appeal is dismissed.
2.The Italian Republic is ordered to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 204, 9.7.2011.